☆ [PDF / Epub] ★ The Ufo Verdict: Examining the Evidence By Robert Sheaffer ✩ – Motyourdrive.co.uk

The Ufo Verdict: Examining the Evidence chapter 1 The Ufo Verdict: Examining the Evidence, meaning The Ufo Verdict: Examining the Evidence, genre The Ufo Verdict: Examining the Evidence, book cover The Ufo Verdict: Examining the Evidence, flies The Ufo Verdict: Examining the Evidence, The Ufo Verdict: Examining the Evidence 8e1ef800b9342 Popular EPub, The Ufo Verdict Examining The Evidence Author Robert Sheaffer This Is Very Good And Becomes The Main Topic To Read, The Readers Are Very Takjup And Always Take Inspiration From The Contents Of The Book The Ufo Verdict Examining The Evidence, Essay By Robert Sheaffer Is Now On Our Website And You Can Download It By Register What Are You Waiting For Please Read And Make A Refission For You


8 thoughts on “The Ufo Verdict: Examining the Evidence

  1. says:

    A convincing debunking of UFO stories, but scattered and insufficiently thought through.Robert Sheaffer was involved with the early CSICOP now CSI , a skeptical group that evolved out of the American Humanist Association This book came from his research in the 1970s into various claims about flying saucers, and was put out by Prometheus Books, which was CSICOP s publishing wing That it is not really dated, some thirty five years on, says all you need to know about just how stagnant UFOlogy became at the end of the century and into the next.The main part of the book takes up about 66 pages and is presented in the first six chapters These are brief and read like magazine articles After a very short introduction, Sheaffer the report that Jimmy Carter saw a UFO sometime late in the 1960s He details his tracking down of the particulars of this claim, and its possible solution he likely saw Venus which serves as a metonym for the messiness of flying saucer evidence how insufficient it is, how it often yields to conventional explanations.For reasons I do not quite understand, he then steps away to briefly introduce the flying saucer community, limning four major organizations and one that looked as though it might turn out to be major at the time of writing, but never amounted to much He points out that while those engaged in UFOlogy see themselves as modern Galileo s most are amateurs involved in petty arguments It was striking how similar the UFO subculture is to other groups of fringe enthusiasts during the 1970s, jealous of vanishingly small empires of not quite facts.He then returns to the main thrust of the book the first chapter dealt with close encounters of the first kind seeing a UFO and chapters three and four deal with CEII and CEIII tangible evidence and contact These are not encyclopedic but strategic, focusing on the so called best claims and showing there s nothing there no real tangible evidence, and the claims of contact are self contradictory, amounting to nothing than confusing stories The sixth chapter shows that the photographic evidence for UFOs is similarly weak to non existent Though, to be fair, none of the images in this book are very helpful Even photographs of documents done explicitly for the volume are mostly just blobs The only clear images are the various charts The structure, shaky in the beginning, starts falling apart after this introduction it feels as though Sheaffer said everything he really wanted to, and then reached to fill out an entire book We get a chapter on the scientific study of witchcraft, the entire point of which seems to be that UFOlogists might be making themselves look foolish to future historians There are extended riffs on other episodes there s a review of early 20th century belief in fairies he discusses Men in Black and on and on.Some this is interesting and relevant, though how it connects to the rest of the book is unclear In chapter 20, for example, he offers a summary of what he thinks UFOs are this could be the conclusion But then he follows with a chapter on New Zealand sightings and purported videos which could have been handled earlier Chapter 16 introduces his idea of jealous phenomena objects that are seen only by the privileged few This seems like shooting sparrows with a cannon, but, ok, flying saucers are jealous phenomena why is this insight buried so deep in the book, when it could have guided other sections Other bits here do not work as well He insists that metaphysical and inter dimensional interpretations of flying saucers represent a New Wave that crested in the 1970s Except his evidence doesn t really support this he has to continually refer to Ray Palmer and Richard Shaver, and their ideas took shape in the late 1940s and early 1950s Indeed, metaphysical interpretations of UFOs were quite common during this period, as were the inter dimensional theories of N Meade Layne The new wave wasn t quite so new.The other problem with the book is the use of the term science Sheaffer shared the fears of many CSICOP founders that a new wave of irrationalism in the late 1960s and early 1970s was going to kill science and the enlightenment it s an overblown concern, of course, and one that does not reckon with the on going interest in occult and esoteric theories since the dawn of time including the Enlightenment There s never been a time of pure rationality And the Enlightenment was a bit complex than the heroic triumph of reason over the supernatural, as it is presented here.More to the point, there is nothing particularly scientific about this book Sheaffer talks about the need to follow the scientific method in assessing UFO evidence, but never explains what he means by this For one, there is no single scientific method for another, even if we go along with the pop cultural view of the scientific method as presenting a hypothesis, testing it, and then rejecting it or building it into a theory, none of that happens here There s a reference to Popper there s talk of Ockham s razor But these aren t methods.All of this allows Sheaffer to slide too easily from praising the scientific method to moralism Scientists are true heroes because they face up to the harsh realities of the world They refuse to buckle to fantasy UFOlogists flee from reason They are children, in love with their own ideas.If we step away from the posturing scientific and moral we can see that what Sheaffer does here is good, hard work He has evaluated the evidence and shown it wanting No hypotheses needed, no concerns about the fate of Western civilization Get down in the weeds, look, apply intelligence and consistency and the whole of UFOlogy dissolves into a farrago of unsubstantiated stories.There are interesting questions that emerge from this why these stories at this time Why are these stories presented as truth rather than fiction Sheaffer is not equipped to answer these questions which is not a shame.What he did, without the gratuitous posing, was enough.


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *